Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) lashed out at Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) because the federal government pays for 35% of his state's revenue, one of the highest rates in the nation. According to an analysis from personal finance company WalletHub,
CBS host scolds Lindsey Graham
Trump has worn his party down, and few events crystallize it like the GOP’s muted — and, in some cases, positive — response.
Republican congressional leaders huddled with President Donald Trump on Tuesday in search of a clear path forward to make sweeping changes to the country’s border security, energy policy and tax code,
Senator Lindsay Graham on Sunday had his tax cuts argument comprehensively pulled apart by a member of his own party. On Fox News’ weekend broadcast of Sunday Morning Futures, host Maria Bartiromo played a clip from an interview with the veteran GOP ...
Many Republican senators, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), laid out the case ... border issue,” the senator predicted. House GOP strategists believe that pairing a tax package ...
Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) lashed out at Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) because the federal government pays for 35% of his state's revenue, one of the highest rates in the nation.
Congressman Mike Lawler thought the senator’s complaining about ‘subsidizing’ other states was a little rich given his own receives 35% of its revenue from the federal government. Reporter ...
"Barack Can’t Convince His Wife She Has To Do Her Duty?": The Internet Is Firing Back After A Fox News Host Questioned Why Michelle Obama Won't Attend Trump's Inauguration
Sen. Lindsey Graham has all but confirmed he will seek a fifth term, despite certain primary opposition, as he raises millions and launches a new campaign team.
GOP lawmakers had said repeatedly that violent offenders shouldn’t be pardoned and clemency should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Senate Republicans say they’re ready for a new start with President-elect Trump after years of misgivings and mistrust that sometimes boiled over into all-out war between the disruptor-in-chief